|
LEHMAN, LEE & XU
|
China Trademark In The News
|
October 2011
|
In the News |
Apple secures patents on China stores |
By Kathrin Hille in Beijing and Patti Waldmeir in Shanghai MoreON THIS STORY
Apple has a patchy record in securing patents and trademarks in this fast-growing but challenging market. The gaps in the company¡¯s intellectual property rights protection were highlighted by the revelation in July of a fake Apple store in Kunming, the capital of the south-western Chinese province of Yunnan. In the past, Apple has sometimes been slow to register patents or trademarks in China early enough. When it began selling the iPhone there, it had to conduct lengthy negotiations to buy back its trademark from Hanwang, a Chinese technology company that had already registered it in the country. ¡°The majority of Apple¡¯s key patents are not registered in China,¡± said Li Hongjiang, a lawyer at Unitalen, a law firm in Beijing. He said this was the case particularly for patents frequently cited as components of other patents. ¡°Therefore, these patents can be used without compensation in China. This has left room for Apple¡¯s competitors to develop in China, and something resembling the patent wars between Apple and Samsung might well occur in China in the future.¡± Horace Lam, an IP expert at law firm Jones Day in Beijing, said: ¡°People criticise the China IP environment, and I am not saying China has the perfect system ¡ but [with] a lot of really big listed US companies ¨C their IP protection is a joke.¡± China has written new patent and copyright laws in the past several years and a new trademark law is in the pipeline. They are broadly in line with those in other countries. ¡°Most of China¡¯s IP laws comply with China¡¯s WTO and Trips obligations,¡± said Elliot Papageorgiou of Rouse & Co, the IP consultancy in Shanghai, referring to the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. The cost of protecting IP in China is a fraction of that in the west, Mr Papageorgiou said. ¡°You can file a patent in China for no more than $3,000-$4,000. Anybody who doesn¡¯t spend $4,000 extending their foreign patents to China needs their head examined,¡± he said, noting that pursuing an infringer would cost much more than that. Apple did not respond to requests for comment.
|
Novel way to root out online pirates |
By Hao Nan (China Daily) An online game company from Ningbo, Zhejiang province recently found a novel way to improve the intellectual property (IP) rights situation in the Internet business when it decided to let anyone use the trademark of its most popular game at an astonishingly low price - 1 yuan($0.15). Chinese analysts admitted that this was indeed a new approach. The Ningbo-based Lian Lian Kan Network Tech Co owns the rights to a game of the same name, Lian Lian Kan, a very popular game with a large number of downloads. More than 500 million Chinese have played it and some less honest people love it too. It is one of the most pirated brands. "We got the trademark in 2006 but still some companies are using it without authorization," said Lu Ye, the company's CEO, at a press conference in Beijing on Sept 20. The law-breakers include large portals, hundreds of game platforms, and professional download websites. So, "To cut through the massive amount of infringement cases and come up with a winning strategy, we're gonna charge only 1 yuan for trademark use," Lu said. "If they sign a contract with us within the set time, companies or individuals can use the trademark without any threat." The grace period lasts for three months, from Sept 21 to Dec 21. After that time, the company will not hesitate to deal with the pirates through any legal means available. "The online gaming industry is full of chaos, and infringement is commonplace and many cases remain unsettled even after several court hearings and the parties involved can both suffer a lot from wasted time, money and energy," Lu noted. "The 1-yuan deal is a new way to solve the immense infringement problem," he continued. "We're looking at these violators with an open mind, as partners so to speak, and bringing the min to jointly develop this online game to make it better and more competitive." Lu also explained that the action comes in response to the State Council's call for greater IP protection. Zhu Xuezhong, a member of the China Intellectual Property Society, said that poor IP rights protection has really hindered the development of China's online gaming industry. Many companies have even stopped spending money on new game development because the piracy allows people to gain the greatest profit in a shortest amount of time with the smallest investment. "The Ningbo company's decision is an inspiration as well as a new mode of online IP protection," Zhu concluded. China Daily Web link :http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2011-09/28/content_13805956.htm |
DotAsia to improve Asian brand exposure |
Updated: 2011-09-27 13:18 Web link: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2011-09/27/content_13801308.htm |
China Law News |
CONTENTS
_______________________________________________________________________
Stronger protections for Taiwanese in pact urgedAcademics and civil groups yesterday urged the government not to back down from what they called the ¡°basic demands¡± in its negotiations with China over an investment protection deal aimed at ensuring fair treatment for the estimated 1 million Taiwanese investors and others working in China. Apple Wins 40 Patents in China to Counter PiracyPiracy of Apple products has been running rampant in China, but now, Apple has some new ammunition since being granted 40 patents in the country, according to the China Daily. As a result, the Cupertino, Calif.-based company gains additional intellectual property protection in China, where Apple's mobile devices are among the most pirated gadgets. First China Pharma Adopts SEC Balance Sheet RecommendationFirst China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. ("First China" or the "Company"), in accordance with its policy of financial transparency wishes to advise of, and clarify matters concerning a requirement to restate a financial discrepancy brought about by differing jurisdictional regulations governing financial accounting practices in China and the U.S.
|
|
|